How to build hype for a Sony ad via Twitter

10 points to @foamcity aka Ruth from Sony who has just finished twittering from the shoot of Sony's latest blockbuster foam and fun-filled ad in Miami.

Fallon London and Sony have led the way in taking advantage of bloggers' interest in their recent shoots, and this shows just how far they've come. From a few illicit pictures of the Bravia Balls to the managed twittering at this latest shoot, it's clear quite how what once was an accident has now turned into a communications strategy...

Full story at commercial archive. Hat tip to @Katyhowell, who is working with them on the shoot



Picture copyright www.commercial-archive.com

Did you see the moonwalking bear? Or the moonwalking gorilla?

When my colleague James posted on Spinning Around about dothetest.co.uk, the fantastic moonwalking bear ad for Transport for London (TfL) I thought it was amazing. A very clever piece of work, executed incredibly well and with a fantastic message which was bound to be distributed virally...

So I was so disappointed to do a bit of googling (to actually find and credit the agency) and find yesterday's Brand Republic article claiming that WCRS had "borrowed" the idea from a US academic, Daniel J Simons.

Once again it highlights the essential "new transparency" that comes with producing strong creative work these days. If there's a source, then cite it (see my post previously about Sony/Kozyndan). Otherwise it will be found out.

Fair play to TfL - they clearly refer to the academic work which went into the concept behind the creative. But I wonder if WCRS gave appropriate credit to Mr Simons?

You can make up your own minds after watching both - the Simons 1999 version above, and the WCRS 2008 below...





According to today's Brand Republic, a WCRS spokesman is quoted as saying, "We have been assured that this execution does not infringe copyright. We feel it is a powerful message and is one that will have an impact on this very serious issue".

Either way - it's a great piece of communications. Just a shame that the story behind the story is now the story. Not the story itself.